So, that% & $ # Mother I can say?

Art is a cultural element that has always given too much to talk about. Whether it is the folly of his protagonists, the oddities that results or simply that someone would fall into the tip of the liver. Whatever the reason, the truth is that art is inherently controversial because this is the purest expression of the human and yet not know if it's good or bad, are a race conflict with the tendency to express our disagreement sometimes the sheer pleasure of saying no. Within the art world there is something known as censorship, this is total or partial leakage of the contents of a work by consensus or imposition is not appropriate for certain types of people. So then as we bare, profanity and other social issues considered grotesque by consensus. However, being completely critical, these ratings, made by the same people to the works, will inevitably fall into a subjective depending on who sees them and their history. So where is the line on which a censure is appropriate or has gone too far? Well I have bad news, you can not know.

There are so many factors surrounding this debate and all of a subjective character becomes virtually impossible to reach absolute verdict, therefore, the best strategy for this dilemma is to create your own opinion. To better understand the censorship, it is appropriate to go for parts and clearly analyze the various events that occur. The first, of course, sexual content censorship. These are possibly the most famous cases of censorship, at least in art, and at the same time, the most controversial of all. When an artist has crossed the line between art and pornography, considering, of course, that pornography can not be classified as art? Modernity has brought many changes in social ideology and the permissiveness of the systems in which we live and this is the reason why breast is normal to see Martha Higareda screen to the point where we have to memorize radius of the circumference ... but of course we must not forget that these films are, as they say in my ranch, "vulgar mothers? (Read: no more power). This is where we come into conflict: how much, for the sake of art, we teach and how much we have crossed the line between bad girl and a% $ & # in cabaret.

Of course, censorship is not limited to art, we can also find pictures censored, songs that have to do a special version for radio and television programs to which you have to pay to have them in our regular programming, all this with the desire to maintain certain values ​​in society, which are its foundation and support to every situation. Also clear that many might be thinking right now is there anything further from the reality that what I said? And to argue that in a world where female vaginas click shows you what's wrong with my teenager would of seventeen, who is drowning in hormones, consider lunch on the grass? Finally, the human body is normal and I did not come with the story frightening to see some organs because anyone who bathes in the morning you can see them looking down, still, as Aristotle would say wisely: we must find a balance and a balance to things and well aware that there is a limit to everything and pretty clear that although sexuality may be the most normal thing in the world, because there is an excuse to get him everywhere because more accustomed to we are reaching a point where angry to find even in the soup.

Speaking in terms of censorship, the means and literature have had to keep out what they say since the adagio of my favorite spider is in effect: with great power comes great responsibility. And yes, indeed, the power that the media has become so great to be managed responsibly and that, if they can make people vote for a politician or create a generation of 'rebels strawberries?, Then you can make all say% $ & # right and left, and incorporate it into our everyday language. All this long introduction is, above all, to start the issue of profanity or "bad words? As have been measured, not by what they are but for what they symbolize. Objectively, we realize that a word by itself does not have an identity and meaning if it comes in terms of society and the way she uses it. These words tend to have such negative connotations that come to undermine the morals and manners of the people, are expressions of human baseness and offensive to every one of his letters ... at least that they are defined.

In this case, we must make some considerations on the reliability of "bad word? for sticking to what was said, "abortion? is a very bad word, in theory, ultimately, its connotation is negative because we talk about the murder (another bad word) of a human being who can not defend, but I can not imagine myself driving at the time peak and shouting "abortion!? out my window instead of the more regular: %$&#. That is why these words, which in practice are not bad, not only are everywhere but are also issues in television and movies starring recording their message (if negative) in our minds. A few days ago I had this discussion with a close friend on the same subject and his response to me was, "because those are words that are necessary in the language and without them we could not understand us?. Really? I really see no difference whatsoever, so I could not understand me for what would be so colorful slang of the language without the bastards of my friends or without the% $ & # from my neighbor? It is clear that to say this to my friend just turned me face, feminine language which means "bastard?.

Back to the beginning, art is subjective and contemporary trends have shown us as anything can be art ... but art is not anything, therefore, irreverence and innuendo of these elements of conflict, in fact, are part of human reality can present today a gold mine for artists as old and new. What would become of movements like Fluxus or given without the possibility of getting to the society itself in a more radical? These experiments allowed the forbidden, and have much material for anyone with a good idea whose common desire is not the destruction of moral codes, but communion between his concept art, art or your dreams a reality swarming around and it is obliged to live together. On the other hand, trying to understand a bit more the other side of the question, what is certain is that we live in society, a society governed by rules designed to keep the harmony, and foster moral growth of the individual. Thus, it is also true that nobody loves to receive such insults as to be exposed to images without the slightest embarrassment does not make us much grace (for those patients who make them, abstain from comment on this), but also things our daily lives that have been demonized by our own personal paradigm of what is politically correct, but is wonderful in theory, in practice we forget and the test is easier when you have the misfortune to hit the pinky foot ...

I speak from experience because I've never heard anyone express the feeling with, "Glory to God? Finally, the intention is not to inconvenience anyone or infringe the solid blocks of good manners, but you have to deal with the fact that we are free beings in partnership with such diversity is not only to avoid things that attracts us, because we are not obliged even to consider. The last message we could salvage from this vast subject of study is careful not to fall into destructive fanaticism as "not very, very or so, so? is the way that our freedom is not in the tower of the others. Therefore, although it is preferable to avoid it, I doubt anyone die in my writing simply because I prefer not to say% $ & # and better to say a heartfelt "bitch?.

...